Does where you live affect attractiveness?
Direct experimental evidence on neighborhood/location prestige specifically is essentially absent; no cited source manipulated neighborhood as a cue. The adjacent status-cue literature does show a sex-specific pattern: women tend to upgrade a man's attractiveness when he is paired with high-status environmental cues, while men's ratings of women are largely unaffected. In a controlled photo study (Dunn & Searle 2010), women rated the same man as significantly more attractive seated in a high-status car (Bentley) than a neutral car (Ford Fiesta), with no corresponding effect for male raters of women; the exact effect magnitude is not stated in the abstract, so the "~1-point on a 10-point scale" figure should not be asserted. A review/experiment (Gouda-Vossos, Brooks & Dixson 2019) reports that men are rated more physically attractive when shown with expensive cars (Dunn & Searle 2010; Shuler & McCord 2010) or an upscale apartment (Dunn & Hill 2014), while noting these cues do not similarly raise women's attractiveness ratings. Broader cross-cultural work (Buss & Schmitt 2019) shows women weight social status, resources, and resource-holding potential in male partners more than men do. The cited Marzoli et al. (2013) study supports only the weaker, indirect point that wealth/resource cues gain importance under resource scarcity (a budget-allocation scenario task) and does NOT demonstrate selection on neighborhood/affluent-background signals. Net: the status-cue effect on male attractiveness is real but modest, inferred from car/apartment proxies rather than location prestige,
Evidence & sources
- Dunn & Searle 2010, Effect of manipulated prestige-car ownership on both sex attractiveness ratings (British Journal of Psychology / PubMed)
Women rated the same man as significantly more attractive in a high-status car (Bentley) than a neutral car (Ford Fiesta); men's ratings of a woman were unaffected by the car's status. Effect magnitude not given in abstract.
- Gouda-Vossos, Brooks & Dixson 2019, The Interplay Between Economic Status and Attractiveness, and the Importance of Attire in Mate Choice Judgments (Frontiers i
Cites prior findings that men are rated more physically attractive when shown with an expensive car (Dunn & Searle 2010; Shuler & McCord 2010) or an upscale apartment (Dunn & Hill 2014); notes these status cues do not similarly raise women's attractiveness ratings.
- Buss & Schmitt 2019, Mate Preferences and Their Behavioral Manifestations (Annual Review of Psychology)
URL resolves to the correct paper (text not machine-readable due to binary PDF). Standard, well-established finding that women weight social status, resources, and resource-holding potential in male partners more heavily than men do.